<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>2006 on John Paulett</title><link>https://www.johnpaulett.com/posts/2006/</link><description>Recent content in 2006 on John Paulett</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:15:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.johnpaulett.com/posts/2006/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Songbird 0.2 (Almost)</title><link>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/songbird-02-almost/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:15:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/songbird-02-almost/</guid><description>&lt;p>There&amp;rsquo;s a new kid in town,
&lt;a href="http://www.songbirdnest.com/test_flight">Songbird&lt;/a>. Imagine if Firefox
mated with iTunes, and somehow the gray and brush metal interfaces
formed a midnight black child--that would be Songbird. Songbird is an
attempt to use the XUL design framework from Mozilla Firefox to create a
user experience similar to Apple's iTunes program. While some have said
that Songbird is nothing but a direct rip off of iTunes, Songbird brings
new ideas to the media player realm. Like iTunes (and most media
players), there is a library with the typical sorting features. However,
instead of only providing a single source for new content like iTunes
has with iTMS, Songbird uses the whole internet as its &amp;quot;music store.&amp;quot;
Any site with open media content can be part of Songbirds &amp;quot;music
store,&amp;quot; as Songbird auto discovers tracks on the site. Songbird uses
services from Amazon, Creative Commons, eMusic, and dozens of others.
Podcasts and streaming radio are easily accessible sources of content in
Songbird. A nice feature is the Wikipedia plugin (make sure to install
it during the Songbird installation), which shows the Wikipedia page for
the currently playing artist.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Firefox 2.0 beta 2</title><link>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/firefox-20-beta/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:24:37 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/firefox-20-beta/</guid><description>&lt;p>The new version of Mozilla Firefox is out--grab a beta copy
&lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bonecho/all-beta.html">now&lt;/a>! There have
been doubts if Firefox can keep making inroads against Microsoft's
Internet Explorer, given the fact that IE 7 is now out in
&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx">beta&lt;/a> and has many of
the features that the internet community has come to expect from a
&amp;quot;modern browser&amp;quot; (tabbed browser, feed integration, etc.). However, it
appears as if the Mozilla team is going strong with the latest preview
of Firefox and will beat Microsoft to the market in the latest round of
the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars#The_second_browser_war">browser
wars&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Smithsonian Quickly Drops Pluto</title><link>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/smithsonian-quickly-drops-pluto/</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/smithsonian-quickly-drops-pluto/</guid><description>&lt;p>The International Astronomical Union has decided that Pluto &lt;a href="http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=16118">no longer
is considered a
planet&lt;/a>.
This distant body has been reclassified as a &amp;quot;dwarf planet,&amp;quot; along
with two other bodies, Xena and Ceres. While some may feel cheated,
losing one of their beloved planets, the Smithsonian &lt;a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/">Air &amp;amp; Space
Museum&lt;/a> was quick to adopt the new standard.
Within a week and a half, the museum had begun making changes to the
solar system exhibit. The
&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pluto_symbol.svg">symbol&lt;/a> of Pluto,
which had been in a list of all the planets, was hidden behind a black
plastic square.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Downfall of DRM?</title><link>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/downfall-of-drm/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:43:29 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/downfall-of-drm/</guid><description>&lt;p>There has been a lot of buzz this week in the anti-DRM (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Rights_Management">Digital Rights
Management&lt;/a>)
camp. Engadget
&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/02/fairuse4wm-peeps-stay-one-step-ahead-of-microsoft/">posted&lt;/a>
that Microsoft's PlayForSure had been removed by a program called
&lt;a href="http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=114916">FairUse4WM&lt;/a>. While
Microsoft almost immediately pushed a patch out that broke version 1.1
of this program, within the week version 1.2 was released, which
according to its author should be much harder for Microsoft to break.
Meanwhile, in the iTunes arena, a new version of
&lt;a href="http://hymn-project.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1553">QTFairUse6&lt;/a> has
been released which removes the Apple's previously uncrackable DRM,
FairPlay for iTunes v6.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>New Site, New Host</title><link>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/new-site-new-host/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.johnpaulett.com/2006/new-site-new-host/</guid><description>&lt;p>Welcome to the new jhcore.com. After having hosted the website for the
past 3 years on an old computer in my apartment, it was time for a
change to a hosted solution, where I wouldn't have to worry about my
internal network being compromised. After quite a bit of research, I
have settled upon
&lt;a href="http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?223564">DreamHost&lt;/a>--besides multiple
glowing
&lt;a href="http://www.lifehacker.com/software/web-publishing/ask-lifehacker-readers-web-hosting-provider-139504.php">reviews&lt;/a>,
their prices and features are highly competitive.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In addition to switching hosts, I have finally decided to try out
several packaged web-software packages. I have thought about switching
over to &lt;a href="http://www.wordpress.org">WordPress&lt;/a> for about a year and a
half now, but I have always enjoyed creating my very own layout and code
for my site. But hopefully with WordPress I will be able to focus more
upon the content of the site and less with the actual code.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>